Gift of agricultural land converted into
residential land and subsequent illegal construction made with a builder via a
JDA and later on regularized by corporation - issue of indexation period when
does it commence? Does assessee get right of deduction of indexed cost of
acquisition on the illegally constructed pent house arising out of the JDA.
Facts:
Assessee was gifted a land by the donor which was
originally acquired in 1960. It was originally an agricultural land which was
converted into residential land in FY 1988-89 and then gifted to assessee in FY
2022-03. Assessee entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) to develop
the land where in 6 flats were earmarked for assessee and 12 to the builder and
subsequently a 19th flat was also constructed illegally as a penthouse.The
penthouse was then regularized by the corporation authorities with property tax
etc. also being levied on the same. The builder admitted having spent Rs. 750
per sq. ft for the said penthouse as well. This penthouse was sold by the
assessee in FY 2013-14 and the case was reopened by the AO denying the assessee
indexation benefit from 01-04-1981 citing that at that point of time the land
was not even a capital asset as per law since being agricultural land. Secondly
the cost of construction on the penthouse was also denied by the AO in a
reassessment alleging that it was an illegal construction. On appeal to the
ITAT -
Assessee's facts were as under -
1 Conversion of agricultural land to residential land -
1988-89
2 Gift of property 2002-03
3 Entering into JDA 27-12-2003
4 Date of completion of construction 2006-07
5 Completion of project & handing over possession Oct-07
6 Property tax assessment for each individual flats in project 11-10-2007
7 Property tax paid & Khatha has been issued by BBMP in favour of Vasishta
Jayanti 03-01-2008
8 Date of sale 05-07-2013
Plea of the assessee was that since the property was gifted
the cost of acquisition ought to be the FMV as on 01-04-1981, indexation would
be from 01-04-1981 until date of sale besides the claim of cost of construction
and its indexation wef FY 2006-07 (year of completion).
Held in favour of the assessee that they were entitled to
the cost of acquisition wef 01-04-1981 and the indexed cost of construction
from 2006-07.
Case: Jayanti
Vasishta v. ITO 2024 TaxPub(DT) 424 (Bang-Trib)